How Do These Two Companies Approach Multi-GPU Setup?ĪMD and NVIDIA appear to be locked in an endless struggle for supremacy in the GPU world. Let’s look at how both of these technologies work, their differences, and what ultimately went wrong for them. Still, the idea of combining GPUs is fascinating. What might have been the nail in the coffin for the concept of two or more graphics cards working as one was the advancement of technology and the fact that modern high-end GPUs encounter very few problems handling even the most demanding video games at their highest settings.Īs such, it appears that both SLI and Crossfire (and seemingly NVLink) will go down in history as something that only some gaming enthusiasts found worthwhile to use. In any case, it’s still true that NVIDIA’s SLI upgrade does offer a massive improvement. Despite technically still having a pulse, SLI has now been effectively replaced by NVLink, depending on who you ask. However, the lukewarm starts made by these companies for their respective multi-GPU solutions would, unfortunately, continue throughout their entire lifespans.Ĭrossfire was officially laid to rest in 2017. ![]() When these technologies debuted in the mid-2000s, many were excited about the promises they heard. Despite both offering valid approaches to multi-GPU technology, neither can claim to have completely solved their issues. Using two or more graphics cards to do a single job sounds like a great idea in theory, but it might not yield such spectacular results.Ī host of issues plagued both AMD’s Crossfire and NVIDIA’s SLI.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |